|
Cell Signaling Technology Inc
p c ebpβ P C Ebpβ, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/p c ebpβ/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p c ebpβ - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Cell Signaling Technology Inc
c ebpβ C Ebpβ, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/c ebpβ/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c ebpβ - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Santa Cruz Biotechnology
c ebpβ h 7 C Ebpβ H 7, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/c ebpβ h 7/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c ebpβ h 7 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Santa Cruz Biotechnology
c ebpβ C Ebpβ, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/c ebpβ/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c ebpβ - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Proteintech
cebpb Cebpb, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cebpb/product/Proteintech Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cebpb - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Addgene inc
c ebpβ C Ebpβ, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/c ebpβ/product/Addgene inc Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c ebpβ - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Addgene inc
psv x c ebpβ Psv X C Ebpβ, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/psv x c ebpβ/product/Addgene inc Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
psv x c ebpβ - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Cell Signaling Technology Inc
protein beta Protein Beta, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/protein beta/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
protein beta - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Santa Cruz Biotechnology
cebpb sirna ![]() Cebpb Sirna, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cebpb sirna/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cebpb sirna - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Addgene inc
c ebp β ![]() C Ebp β, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/c ebp β/product/Addgene inc Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c ebp β - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Cell Signaling Technology Inc
c ebpβ specific antibody ![]() C Ebpβ Specific Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/c ebpβ specific antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c ebpβ specific antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: Science signaling
Article Title: The transcription factor C/EBPβ in the dorsal root ganglion contributes to peripheral nerve trauma–induced nociceptive hypersensitivity
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aam5345
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Cebpb mRNA abundance in the ipsilateral (Ipsi) and contralateral (Contral) L3/4 DRGs (top) and C/EBPβ protein expression in the ipsilateral L3/4 DRGs (bottom) after CCI. Unilateral L3/4 DRGs from two mice were pooled together to obtain enough RNA and protein. n = 3 biological replicates (six mice) per time point. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey post hoc test, F3,11 = 26.87 for Cebpb mRNA and F3,11 = 14.04 for C/EBPβ protein. *P < 0.05 or **P < 0.01 compared to the corresponding control group (0 day). H3, histone 3. (B) C/EBPβ protein abundance in the contralateral L3/4 DRGs after CCI. Representative Western blots and a summary of densitometric analysis are shown. n = 3 biological replicates (six mice) per time point. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test, F3,11 = 0.49. (C) C/EBPβ protein abundance in the ipsilateral L3/4 spinal cord after CCI. n = 3 biological replicates (three mice) per time point. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test, F3,11 = 1.99. (D) In situ hybridization histochemistry (ISHH) for Cebpb mRNA and immunohistochemistry of different DRG cell markers: β III tubulin, glutamine synthetase (GS), NF200, IB4, or CGRP in the DRG. n = 3 mice. Scale bar, 25 µm. (E) Distribution of Cebpb mRNA–labeled neuronal somata. Large, 31%; medium, 43%; small, 26%. (F) Neurons labeled by Cebpb mRNA in the ipsilateral L4 DRG on day 7 after CCI or sham surgery. n = 3 mice per group. **P < 0.01 compared to the corresponding sham group by two-tailed paired Student’s t test. Scale bar, 25 µm.
Article Snippet: For siRNA injection,
Techniques: Expressing, Control, Quantitative Proteomics, Western Blot, In Situ Hybridization, Immunohistochemistry, Labeling, Two Tailed Test
Journal: Science signaling
Article Title: The transcription factor C/EBPβ in the dorsal root ganglion contributes to peripheral nerve trauma–induced nociceptive hypersensitivity
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aam5345
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) The abundance of C/EBPβ, OCT1, and mTOR after transfection of Cebpb or negative control siRNA (NC) into cultured DRG neurons. Representative Western blots and a summary of densitometric analysis are shown. n = 3 biological replicates per treatment. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test, F2,8 = 9.647 for C/EBPβ, F2,8 = 0.497 for OCT1, and F2,8 = 0.037 for mTOR. *P < 0.05 compared to naïve group. GAPDH, glyceraldhyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. (B and C) Effect of pre-microinjection of Cebpb siRNA (Si) into the ipsilateral L3/4 DRGs on basal or CCI-induced increases in Cebpb mRNA expression (B) and C/EBPβ protein abundance (C) on day 7 after CCI or post-sham surgery in the ipsilateral L3/4 DRGs. Unilateral L3/4 DRGs from two mice were pooled together. n = 6 to 8 mice per group. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test, F4,16 = 17.041 in (B) and F4,19 = 9.614 in (C). **P < 0.01 compared to the vehicle (V) plus sham group. #P < 0.05 or ##P < 0.01 compared to the vehicle plus CCI group. (D to J) Effect of pre-microinjection of Cebpb siRNA, vehicle, or negative control siRNA into the ipsilateral L3/4 DRGs on paw withdrawal frequencies to mechanical stimuli (D and E), paw withdrawal latency to thermal stimulation (F), and paw jumping latency to cold stimulation (G) on the ipsilateral side and on basal paw withdrawal responses to mechanical (H and I) and thermal (J) stimuli on the contralateral side at different days after CCI or sham surgery. n = 10 mice per group. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test, F4,199 = 37.159 in (D), F4,199 = 27.312 in (E), F4,199 = 37.336 in (F), F4,199 = 56.651 in (G), F4,199 = 2.071 in (H), F4,199 = 0.472 in (I), and F4,199 = 0.681 in (J). **P < 0.01 compared to the corresponding baseline (day –4). (K and L) Effect of pre-microinjection of Cebpb siRNA into the ipsilateral L3/4 DRGs on CCI-induced increases in the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2) and abundance of GFAP in the ipsilateral L3/4 dorsal horn on day 5 post–spinal nerve ligation (SNL). Representative Western blots (K) and a summary of densitometric analysis (L) are shown. n = 6 to 8 mice per group. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test, F2,9 = 9.003 for p-ERK1, F2,9 = 8.899 for p-ERK2, F2,11 = 0.156 for ERK1, F2,11 = 0.192 for ERK2, and F2,11 = 8.163 for GFAP. *P < 0.05 compared to the corresponding vehicle plus sham group. #P < 0.05 compared to the corresponding vehicle plus CCI group.
Article Snippet: For siRNA injection,
Techniques: Transfection, Negative Control, Cell Culture, Western Blot, Microinjection, Expressing, Quantitative Proteomics, Phospho-proteomics, Ligation
Journal: Science signaling
Article Title: The transcription factor C/EBPβ in the dorsal root ganglion contributes to peripheral nerve trauma–induced nociceptive hypersensitivity
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aam5345
Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean changes in locomotor function SEM given in parentheses. n = 10 mice per group; five trials.
Article Snippet: For siRNA injection,
Techniques: Functional Assay, Negative Control, Saline
Journal: Science signaling
Article Title: The transcription factor C/EBPβ in the dorsal root ganglion contributes to peripheral nerve trauma–induced nociceptive hypersensitivity
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aam5345
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A to G) Effect of DRG microinjection of Cebpb siRNA, vehicle, or negative control siRNA starting on day 5 after CCI on paw withdrawal frequencies to mechanical stimuli (A and B), paw withdrawal latency to thermal stimulation (C), and paw jumping latency to cold stimulation (D) on the ipsilateral side and on basal paw withdrawal responses to mechanical (E and F) and thermal (G) stimuli on the contralateral side on days 12 and 14 after CCI. n = 10 mice per group. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test, F2,119 = 26.777 in (A), F2,119 = 31.439 in (B), F2,119 = 15.275 in (C), F2,119 = 18.089 in (D), F2,119 = 0.093 in (E), F2,119 < 0.001 in (F), and F2,119 = 0.157 in (G). **P < 0.01 compared to the vehicle plus CCI group at the corresponding time points.
Article Snippet: For siRNA injection,
Techniques: Microinjection, Negative Control
Journal: Science signaling
Article Title: The transcription factor C/EBPβ in the dorsal root ganglion contributes to peripheral nerve trauma–induced nociceptive hypersensitivity
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aam5345
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A and B) Cebpb mRNA expression (A) and C/EBPβ protein abundance (B) in the ipsilateral L3/4 DRGs 8 weeks after microinjection of AAV5-C/EBPβ or control AAV5-EGFP. n = 6 mice per group. Two-tailed, independent Student’s t test, *P < 0.05 compared to the AAV5-EGFP group. (C to F) Effect of microinjection of AAV5-C/EBPβ or AAV5-EGFP into the unilateral L3/4 DRGs on paw withdrawal frequencies to mechanical stimuli (C and D), paw withdrawal latency to thermal stimulation (E), and paw jumping latency to cold stimulation (F) on the ipsilateral and contralateral sides at the different weeks after microinjection. n = 10 mice per group. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test, F3,239 = 42.76 in (C), F3,239 = 39.60 in (D), F3,239 = 59.08 in (E), and F1,119 = 49.879 in (F). **P < 0.01 compared to the control AAV5-EGFP group on the ipsilateral side at the corresponding time points. (G and H) Effect of microinjection of AAV5-C/EBPβ or AAV5-EGFP into the unilateral L3/4 DRGs on spontaneous ongoing pain as assessed by CPP paradigm. n = 16 mice per group. **P < 0.01 compared to the corresponding preconditioning (G) or the AAV5-EGFP group (H) by two-tailed, independent Student’s t test.
Article Snippet: For siRNA injection,
Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative Proteomics, Microinjection, Control, Two Tailed Test
Journal: Science signaling
Article Title: The transcription factor C/EBPβ in the dorsal root ganglion contributes to peripheral nerve trauma–induced nociceptive hypersensitivity
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aam5345
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A and B) Ehmt2 mRNA expression (A), the abundance of G9a’s two protein isoforms (B), and the amount of H3K9me2-marked protein (B) in the ipsilateral L3/4 DRGs 7 days after CCI or sham surgery in the mice pre-microinjected with vehicle, negative control siRNA, or Cebpb siRNA into the ipsilateral L3/4 DRGs. Unilateral L3/4 DRGs from two mice were pooled together. n = 6 to 8 mice per group. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test, F4,16 = 33.704 for Ehmt2 mRNA, F4,19 = 16.879 for G9a-L, F4,19 = 28.072 for G9a-S, and F4,14 = 19.035 for H3K9me2. **P < 0.01 compared to the corresponding vehicle plus sham group; #P < 0.05 or ##P < 0.01 compared to the corresponding vehicle plus CCI group. L, long isoform; S, short isoform. (C and D) The amounts of Ehmt2 mRNA (C), G9a’s two protein isoforms (D), and H3K9me2 protein (D) in the injected L3/4 DRGs 8 weeks after microinjection of AAV5-C/EBPβ or control AAV5-EGFP. n = 6 to 8 mice per group. Two-tailed, independent Student’s t test, *P < 0.05 compared to the corresponding AAV5-EGFP group. (E) Coexpression of Cebpb mRNA with Ehmt2 mRNA in small, medium, and large DRG neurons. Gapdh mRNA was used a positive control. n = 3 biological replicates. M, ladder marker. (F) ChIP analysis of C/EBPβ binding to a fragment of the Ehmt2 gene distal promoter in the ipsilateral L3/4 DRGs on day 7 after CCI or sham surgery. Input, total purified fragments. Ipsilateral L3/4 DRGs from 3 mice were pooled together. n = 9 mice per group. (G to I) The abundance of C/EBPβ, G9a’s two protein isoforms, and H3K9me2 in mouse cultured DRG neurons transduced as indicated. Representative Western blots (G) and a summary of densitometric analysis [C/EBPβ (H) and G9a-L, G9a-S, and H3K9me2 (I)] are shown. n = 5 biological replicates per treatment. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test, F5,29 = 51.42 for C/EBPβ, F5,29 = 19.66 for G9a-L, F5,29 = 27.95 for G9a-S, and F5,29 = 10.16 for H3K9me2. **P < 0.01 compared to the corresponding naïve group; ##P < 0.01 compared to the corresponding C/EBPβ-treated group.
Article Snippet: For siRNA injection,
Techniques: Expressing, Negative Control, Injection, Microinjection, Control, Two Tailed Test, Positive Control, Marker, Binding Assay, Purification, Cell Culture, Western Blot
Journal: Science signaling
Article Title: The transcription factor C/EBPβ in the dorsal root ganglion contributes to peripheral nerve trauma–induced nociceptive hypersensitivity
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aam5345
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A and B) Oprm1 and Kcan2 mRNA expression (A) and protein abundance (B) in the ipsilateral L3/4 DRGs 7 days after sham surgery or CCI in the mice pre-microinjected with vehicle, negative control siRNA, or Cebpb siRNA into the ipsilateral L3/4 DRGs. Unilateral L3/4 DRGs were pooled together. n = 6 to 8 mice per group. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test, F4,16 = 13.249 for Oprm1 mRNA, F4,16 = 14.464 for Kcna2 mRNA, F4,19 = 12.658 for MOR protein, and F4,19 = 11.820 for Kv1.2 protein. *P < 0.05 or **P < 0.01 compared to the corresponding vehicle plus sham group; #P < 0.05 compared to the corresponding vehicle plus CCI group. (C and D) Oprm1 and Kcna2 mRNA expression (C) and MOR and Kv1.2 protein abundance (D) in the injected L3/4 DRGs 8 weeks after microinjection of AAV5-C/EBPβ or control AAV5-EGFP. n = 6 to 8 mice per group. Two-tailed, independent Student’s t test, *P < 0.05 compared to the corresponding AAV5-EGFP group. (E and F) Coexpression of Cebpb mRNA with Oprm1 mRNA (E) or Kcna2 mRNA (F) in small, medium, and large DRG neurons. Gapdh mRNA was used as a positive control. n = 3 biological replicates per gene. (G and H) The abundance of C/EBPβ protein, G9a’s two protein isoforms, and H3K9me2 protein (G) and MOR and Kv1.2 protein (H) in cultured DRG neurons from adult wild-type (WT) (G9afl/fl mice) or G9a conditional knockout (KO) mice. The cultured neurons were collected 2 days after they were transduced with AAV5-EGFP or AAV5-C/EBPβ. n = 3 biological replicates per group. One-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test, F3,11 = 10.206 for C/EBPβ, F3,11 = 51.332 for G9a-L, F3,11 = 38.517 for G9a-S, F3,11 = 52.955 for H3K9me2, F3,11 = 27.503 for MOR, and F3,11 = 30.199 for Kv1.2. *P < 0.05 or **P < 0.01 compared to the corresponding AAV5-EGFP–treated WT mice; ##P < 0.01 compared to the corresponding the AAV5-C/EBPβ–treated WT mice. (I) Venn diagram of genes from microarray analysis of the DRG in the mice that overexpressed Ehmt2 (11) and from RNA sequencing data of the injured DRG in a neuropathic pain mouse model treated with a G9a inhibitor (21). About 254 genes overlapped between these two databases.
Article Snippet: For siRNA injection,
Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative Proteomics, Negative Control, Injection, Microinjection, Control, Two Tailed Test, Positive Control, Cell Culture, Knock-Out, Transduction, Microarray, RNA Sequencing
Journal: Science signaling
Article Title: The transcription factor C/EBPβ in the dorsal root ganglion contributes to peripheral nerve trauma–induced nociceptive hypersensitivity
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aam5345
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Effect of pre-microinjection of Cebpb siRNA or vehicle into the ipsilateral DRG on morphine (1 mg/kg, subcutaneously) analgesia on the ipsilateral side 3 days after CCI. n = 9 mice per group. One-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test, F2,26 = 7.833 on the ipsilateral side and F2,26 = 0.969 on the contralateral side. *P < 0.05 compared to the corresponding vehicle plus sham group. #P < 0.01 compared to the corresponding vehicle plus CCI group. MPAE, maximal possible analgesic effect. (B) Effect of intraperitoneal injection with methylnaltrexone (2 mg/kg) on the Cebpb siRNA–produced antinociceptive effect on day 4 after CCI on the ipsilateral side of the Cebpb siRNA–treated group. Paw withdrawal latency to thermal stimulation was measured before and 30 min after drug administration on day 4 after CCI or sham surgery. n = 9 mice per group. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test, F2,80 = 109.908 on the ipsilateral side and F2,80 = 0.718 on the contralateral side. **P < 0.01 compared to the corresponding vehicle plus sham group −1 day after CCI or sham surgery. #P < 0.05 compared to the vehicle plus CCI group before drug administration on day 4 after CCI or sham surgery. $P < 0.05 compared to the Cebpb siRNA plus CCI group before drug administration on day 4 after CCI or sham surgery.
Article Snippet: For siRNA injection,
Techniques: Microinjection, Injection, Produced